Unveiling the Dark Reality of Psychiatric Hospitals: Patient Abuse and Unethical Practices Exposed

Table of Contents:

1. Introduction
2. The Process of Admitting Patients to Psychiatric Hospitals
3. Allegations Against Dr. Naggie Kier
4. Pre-Signed Clinical Certificates: A Violation of Patient Rights
5. Lack of Examination and Diagnosis Accuracy
6. Pressure to Keep Patients in the Hospital
7. Financial Incentives for Long Inpatient Stays
8. Multiple State Complaints Against Dr. Kier
9. Failure of State Investigations and Disciplinary Actions
10. Consequences for Patients

Introduction

In the United States of America, allegations have emerged regarding patients being locked up and held against their will in psychiatric hospitals, or coerced into staying for treatment of illnesses they claim they do not have. This alarming situation raises questions about the mental health system and the violation of civil rights. As an investigative team, we have delved deep into these allegations, talking with patients, former employees, and poring over numerous documents. Our findings have revealed a complex and disturbing reality that sheds light on the flaws in our mental health system.

The Process of Admitting Patients to Psychiatric Hospitals

When individuals in crisis seek help, they often end up in the closest emergency room. This can happen by their own choice or due to the intervention of a police officer, family member, or doctor who deems them a danger to themselves or others. Once in the hospital emergency room, they are typically placed in a psych holding area until a bed becomes available in a psychiatric hospital. According to state law, patients are supposed to see a psychiatrist within 24 hours of admission. Unfortunately, many patients report experiencing poor treatment during this crucial time.

Allegations Against Dr. Naggie Kier

One psychiatrist who has come under scrutiny is Dr. Naggie Kier. Patients, parents, and employees have come forward to share their troubling experiences with his psychiatric treatment at various hospitals. Dr. Kier's practices have been called into question, with accusations of unethical behavior and a lack of concern for patients' well-being. Despite these allegations, Dr. Kier denies any wrongdoing and claims to be unaware of any unethical practices.

Pre-Signed Clinical Certificates: A Violation of Patient Rights

One alarming practice that has been uncovered is the use of pre-signed clinical certificates in the civil commitment process. These forms, which are supposed to be filled out at the time of evaluation, have been found to be pre-signed by Dr. Kier. This raises serious concerns about the accuracy and integrity of the diagnostic process. Experts argue that this practice violates patient rights and undermines the trust between doctors and their patients.

Lack of Examination and Diagnosis Accuracy

Patients have reported seeing a different psychiatrist on most days, which makes it difficult to establish continuity of care. In some cases, patients have been diagnosed with conditions they deny having, such as psychosis or bipolar disorder. These diagnoses are often not supported by the patients' medical records or thorough examinations by the treating physicians. This lack of accuracy raises questions about the validity of diagnoses and the appropriateness of the prescribed treatments.

Pressure to Keep Patients in the Hospital

Former employees and patients have revealed that there is significant pressure to keep patients in the hospital for longer periods. The threat of court involvement and the use of legal proceedings are often used to coerce patients into staying voluntarily or involuntarily. Patients have alleged that Dr. Kier and others manipulate the system to their advantage, prolonging hospital stays for financial gain.

Financial Incentives for Long Inpatient Stays

Psychiatric hospitals, including Pontiac General Hospital, receive Medicaid payments for inpatient care. The longer a patient's stay, the more money the hospital can bill. This financial incentive has raised concerns about whether patient care decisions are being influenced by financial considerations rather than the best interests of the patients. The high number of patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder or psychosis suggests a potential overdiagnosis issue.

Multiple State Complaints Against Dr. Kier

Dr. Kier has faced multiple complaints filed with Michigan's Department of Licensing and Regulatory Affairs (LARA) since 2013. These complaints accuse him of various violations, including forcing patients to take medications, failing to spend adequate time with patients during evaluations, and violating the public health code. Despite the numerous complaints, the majority have not resulted in any disciplinary actions or deeper investigations.

Failure of State Investigations and Disciplinary Actions

The failure to pursue penalties or conduct further investigations into Dr. Kier's practices raises concerns about the oversight and accountability within the mental health system. Patients and advocates argue that consistent complaints should trigger a more thorough examination of a healthcare professional's practices to ensure patient safety and wellbeing.

Consequences for Patients

For patients who have experienced wrongful hospitalizations and improper diagnoses, the consequences can be severe. They may suffer trauma, loss of personal freedom, and a worsening of their mental health. The system's failure to address these issues can leave patients feeling unheard and further undermine their trust in the mental health system.

Overall, the allegations against Dr. Naggie Kier and the issues surrounding psychiatric hospital admissions highlight significant gaps and flaws within the mental health system. It is imperative that these concerns be addressed to ensure the rights and well-being of patients are protected.

Disclaimer: The allegations and claims mentioned in this article are based on testimonies and documents obtained by the investigative team. Investigations are ongoing, and further updates may follow.

Highlights

• Alarming allegations of patients being held against their will in psychiatric hospitals
• Questionable practices and ethics of psychiatrist Dr. Naggie Kier
• Pre-signed clinical certificates raise concerns about patient rights violations
• Lack of comprehensive examinations and accuracy in diagnoses
• Financial incentives for prolonged inpatient stays complicate patient care decisions
• Numerous state complaints filed against Dr. Kier
• Failure of state investigations and disciplinary actions
• Severe consequences for patients, including trauma and loss of personal freedom